Author's note: Sheesh, 2012 me was kind of preachy
A NOVEL PERSPECTIVE (12/09/2012)
Maybe it's just me, but I've always considered RPs as stories first, and games second. Even if it's a story with multiple authors and protagonists, I love copying the IC posts to Word for posterity, editing them into a coherent narrative, and reading through them later. This has, I admit, coloured the way I like to see RPs written. This blog is partly a discussion of some observations I've made after reading through many different RPs on this site, and partly a framework for what might become my "GM rules" when inspiration to start a new story next strikes me. Hopefully, looking back on it will help me figure out which "rules" are genuinely useful tips and which are products of my own personal OCD.
Tense: This one is fairly likely to fall into the OCD camp, but I always find it best when posts are written in the 3rd person past tense, like in most stories. In other words, written as "he did this", rather than "I did this", or "he does this". I understand that present-tense writing has its roots in real-life roleplaying games, which all the writing we do here is ultimately based on, but it looks weird in the context of a story. It's especially jarring to me when some posts in a thread are written this way and others aren't. Likewise, first-person writing has its place in storytelling, but only when a story has a single clear protagonist, rather than multiple protagonists as is usually the case in any RP featuring more than one writer.
Quoting: This goes hand in hand with the above, as far as reader immersion goes. When writing, it's often useful to include snippets of other people's posts to help place the action and make clear its context. However, to me, quote boxes in the IC damage the flow for the reader. I much prefer some other way of indicating another writer's text, such as italics or bold, although I feel simply copying the text in a different colour usually works best. A different colour for each writer is a personal favourite of mine, especially if it is consistent throughout the thread since it becomes easy to tell at a glance who wrote what.
Relevance: In the search to make a decent length post, it's tempting to pad the writing out with filler. The most common versions of this that I've seen are routines and descriptions of clothing. Now I'm not saying that these things can't be useful - routines in real life are a great time for introspecting, and interspacing a simple morning shower routine with a character's thoughts can be a great way to deepen their personality or explore how they are feeling about recent developments. Likewise, how a character dresses can often tell us something about them; whether they are outgoing, conservative, fond of a particular scene - or even to set up these expectations about the character so that they can be subverted later on.
However, this relevance to the story has to be maintained. I recall particularly one RP I was in where almost the entire first page of the IC consisted of nothing but the players describing, in agonising detail, their characters getting dressed and ready for school. And aside from telling me something about the writers' personal taste in clothing, it was completely irrelevant to the story. When making an IC post, always ask yourself how what you are writing is advancing either the plot, or the character that you are following.
Goldfish Syndrome: This is an interesting one, which I think stems from the difference in time between real life writing, and time progression within a RP. Several days or even weeks might pass before a given player posts again, and it's all too easy to forget what has gone before in this time. This links back yet again to me seeing RPs as novels and liking to re-read them afterwards, because it's upon re-reading that these things become apparent. Focussing your new post around how a character reacts to the latest plot development is all well and good, but sometimes what has gone before can (and logically should) colour the character's reaction. In the most unfortunate cases, it can look like characters are having schizophrenic mood swings, or have simply forgotten something that happened to them less than an hour ago. Remember to read back through previous posts (both yours and others) to have the right context in your mind when you go to write your next IC post.
Human Needs: Also worth mentioning is the opposite end of the spectrum; those times when a long period has passed in-universe, usually as a product of GM-driven time skips. Sometimes this can throw up problems of its own. This is a highly situational example, but in one of the RPs that I am currently involved in, there is a plot point of most of the characters refusing to eat (because some of the food is drugged...it makes sense in context). However, when the GM time-skipped the story forward by 8 hours or so, and the characters still refused to eat, very few players addressed how going for an extended period without food might affect their character's mood and physical fitness.
Now, in stories with dragons and starships and everything else the fertile imaginations of RPA's writers can come up with, it's easy to forget about the more mundane things. But characters, at least human ones, still need things like food and sleep. In many cases this is not important (no-one wants to read about characters taking regular toilet breaks, for example) but when it is both relevant and shown it can be a good way of making the characters seem both more realistic and easier to empathise with.
----------------------------------------------------
Comments:
Lamb - 09-12-2012 07:36 PM
If you're going to siphon thoughts directly out of my brain, warn me next time! I really agree with all of this--to me most RPs are hardly games. It's the writing, the character interaction, and the sense of unity you feel when working on a creative project with others. This is probably why I could never get into dice games and the like. Writing a story is fun, but not knowing parts of the story (the parts that others will write) makes it exciting. And I do think it's very odd when the tense or the perspective is inconsistent. One person is writing first person present, everyone else is writing third person past...it's weird. Anyway, you've definitely convinced me that any RP you post in the future will be well worth looking into.
Azazeal849 - 09-12-2012 07:47 PM
Thanks for reading, Lamb I've got two RPs on the go right now, one here and one on Warseer, so it might be a while before I have the time and inspiration to start another!
The Imposter - 09-12-2012 10:31 PM
I've gotta say that I'm pretty lined up in my brain to your rp theology here. Nice thoughts brah.
Bookmarks