I don't think we should get rid of these awards and instead refresh them every year. There's an overlap sure, but maybe to keep the awards feeling fresh we swap out which awards are featured each year. Downsizing in general will be better. Keep the most diverse awards and swap out the others yearly?
I also think member based awards can be fun, if the person featured was exempt. So "Most Likely to End up in Kris office" is a fun award, but, Kris shouldn't be able to win it. Maybe the same with Storm's award haha.
Also if we're doing special awards we could do a "Most Likely to Give in to Decay" and just disqualify me from winning it. That's just an example but it would allow this years awards to feel unique.
Maybe also we do a "two time champ" block on awards too. Maybe you can win the same award two years in a row, but after that you're locked out of it. Meaning I couldn't have "Most Likely to Become a Superhero" or "Best Blogger" like I did in years past. That way the same people aren't always winning.
I guess we need to ask what are the "essential awards" that should be main stays every year and what are considered "special awards" that could be swapped out to provide a more fresh award show.
I like this better. It trims down the base, allows both categories to be filled up faster/easier since they're now combined, and we won't run into any problems where we could hurt a member that doesn't belong in the category we assumed they did.
Bookmarks